Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 





Getting It Right on Iran
Thursday, 15 February 2007 19:48
by Larry C. Johnson

The truth about the Iranian threat is that the Bush Administration is not telling the real truth.  Like any effective propagandist President Bush is using a kernel of truth and, with the help of many in the media, laying the foundation for another war.  Only this time it will likely be a war of retaliation rather than one of pre-emption.

The kernel of truth is that Iranian intelligence agents are active in Iraq and are working with a variety of Shia militia and groups.  What Bush cleverly omits in his litany is the fact that Iran has been present in Iraq since the early days of the U.S. invasion in March of 2003.  Bush and his generals also are ignoring the fact that Sunni insurgents, not Iranian backed Shia militia, have been those responsible for the vast majority of U.S. casualties in Iraq. 

You do not have to accept my word or my numbers.  Go to icasualties.org (and while you are there leave a donation for these deserving folks) and count for yourselves.  According to the U.S. officials who briefed reporters in Baghdad last Sunday, Iranian explosives figured in the deaths of 170 U.S. soldiers and the wounding of 620 since June of 2004.  However, total coalition casualties during that same period are 2,265 dead and 17,788 wounded.  For the math challenged among you that means Iran is linked to less than 8% of the fatalities and less than 4% of the wounded. 

Known and very popular cialis coupon which gives all the chance to receive a discount for a preparation which has to be available and exactly cialis coupons has been found in the distant room of this big house about which wood-grouses in the houses tell.

The conclusion is very simple.  Iran is not responsible for most U.S. casualties, whether from explosives, small arms fire, or thrown rocks.  Now it gets interesting.

Who is our main enemy and who is responsible for the vast majority of U.S. casualties?  Sunni insurgent groups — ranging from Al Qaeda jihadist to angry Baathists.

Iran for its part has shied away from encouraging or supporting widespread attacks against U.S. forces because the United States is perceived as helping the Shia consolidate power in Iraq and acknowledged for concentrating its firepower on the Sunnis.  Remember Fallujah?  Tall Afar?  How about Al Anbar?  What about Zarqawi?

With Zarqawi dead and buried the Bush Administration has christened Moqtada al Sadr as its latest villain.  But this is another lie.  Moqtada al Sadr is the least Iran friendly of the various Shia clerics.  Moqtada is no friend of the United States but he is first and foremost an Iraqi nationalist.  He is not an Iranian toady.  That distinction goes to Mr. Abdul-Aziz Al-Hakim.  Remember him?  He's the guy who was sitting with George Bush for a photo op in the Oval Office in December.

So let me see if I have this straight.  The Iraqi Shia cleric closest to the Iranians, who are responsible for killing some of our soldiers, gets an invite to the White House for a grip and grin.  Meanwhile the Iraqi Shia cleric least favorably disposed to Iran becomes our new public enemy and now has sought refuge in Iran.  Great!  Rather than drive a big wedge between Iran and al Sadr we give him a reason to reach out to Tehran. 

In the coming weeks the friction points with Iran are likely to increase.  If U.S. forces escalate operations against Iranian interests and Iranian personnel they will retaliate.  They may not accept the Old Testament as their basis of faith but they certainly believe in an "eye for an eye".  The Iranians take blood feuds seriously and will retaliate against us.  Even events not directly tied to us will be viewed by Tehran thru the lens of the looming U.S. threat and we are likely to be blamed.  Today, for example, a group of Iranian Revolutionary Guard were killed in a terrorist bombing near the border of Afghanistan.  The Iranians, using Bush-style analysis, will probably conclude that this was a U.S. backed action.  I anticipate they will become more bold in their retaliation.   

As the U.S. versus Iran tit-for-tat intensifies new U.S. casualties will fuel the war fever among the American people and support for "decisive" action against Iran will grow.  Most members of Congress, fearful of being labled as going soft on the Iranian mullahs, more likely than not will fall into line and will back President Bush as he starts a new crusade against the Iranian regime.  Unfortunately for America these events will probably produce a deeper, more deadly quagmire that will compound the horror already underway in Iraq.  Instead of battling primarily Sunni insurgents we will get to add Shia and Iranians to the mix.  And how does that serve our national interest?
More from this author:
Gee Whiz, Iran Training Militia, Who Knew? (9385 Hits)
by Larry C Johnson Well, the New York Times just got sucked in again to help the Bush Administration make the case for starting a war with...
Swearing on the Quran? (7962 Hits)
by Larry C Johnson Normally I ignore religious controversy, but the latest flap surrounding incoming Democratic Congressman Keith Ellison, a...
A Soldier's Story - MAJOR BILL EDMONDS (10240 Hits)
by MAJOR BILL EDMONDS [Note from Larry Johnson:  A CIA buddy forwarded this article.  It is a must read.  It is consistent...
The Iraq Catch-22 (7563 Hits)
by Larry C Johnson Regardless of your feelings or beliefs about sending more U.S troops to Iraq, you must accept the painful truth that...
Three Must Reads (6528 Hits)
 by Larry C Johnson The mainstream media has finally caught up and fleshed out some important issues regarding Iraq that I wrote about on...
Related Articles:
Nukes: Iran and North Korea are not the problem (17585 Hits)
by Mickey Z. Thanks to the nuclear aspirations of North Korea and Iran, there's no shortage of rhetoric along these lines: "We can't let...
Midterm Elections 2006: It's Always Darkest, Right Before ... It Goes Completely Black (13951 Hits)
by Phil Rockstroh If voting could change the system, it would be illegal. --Theodore Adorno "I can't go on. I'll go on....
The Dems’ New Power: Investigative Hearings Done Right (7990 Hits)
by Andrew Bard Schmookler On Election Day, America took a step that history may show to have been absolutely crucial in saving this republic....
Iran turns up the Heat (8693 Hits)
by Mike Whitney By now, anyone with a lick of sense can see that the war in Iraq has been a dead-loss. Still, few people understand how it...
Gee Whiz, Iran Training Militia, Who Knew? (9385 Hits)
by Larry C Johnson Well, the New York Times just got sucked in again to help the Bush Administration make the case for starting a war with...

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments (0)add comment

Write comment
smaller | bigger



Top 123