While I did not work on this first version of the SPARC chip (joining just as it was in its final finishing stages), I did on subsequent generations of microchips, systems, and operating systems over the next decade (Sun-4 and Sun-5). This is how I too, albeit in a small way, helped usher in George H.W. Bush's infamous vision of the “New World Order”, for without these microchips, there surely wouldn't be one! While the monumental crimes against humanity of the two World Wars in the past century were perpetrated without the aid of microchips, the present enslaving of humanity into the surveillance society of 'one-world government' is only effectuated with the help of the Technetronic Revolution wrought by these microchips. See Zbigniew Brzezinski's “Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era”.
While IEEE Spectrum today celebrates this revolution, noting:
“Their designs proved so cutting-edge, so out of the box, so ahead of their time, that we are left groping for more technology clichés to describe them. Suffice it to say that they gave us the technology that made our brief, otherwise tedious existence in this universe worth living.”,
as a direct participant with two dozen design patents on microchips and systems, I am not so sure. A simpler times now appear more appealing. Not much of a short-break, was this! We are still talking about NWO. Everything appears interrelated and interlocked. To make a decent moral living, minimally doing no harm, ideally doing good things and leaving a positive legacy rather than a negative one, appears well-nigh impossible. There is just no escape from the New World Order. Arguably, we all contribute to it in some way in the modernity du jour – unless we choose to escape the modern-age and live on pastoral farms and in the mountains.

PHOTO: Robert Garner
Sun Microsystems SPARC Processor (1987)
There was a time,
long ago (the early 1980s), when people wore neon-colored leg warmers
and watched “Dallas,” and microprocessor architects sought to increase
the complexity of CPU instructions as a way of getting more
accomplished in each compute cycle. But then a group at the University
of California, Berkeley, always a bastion of counterculture, called for
the opposite: Simplify the instruction set, they said, and you’ll
process instructions at a rate so fast you’ll more than compensate for
doing less each cycle. The Berkeley group, led by David Patterson, called their approach RISC, for reduced-instruction-set computing.
As
an academic study, RISC sounded great. But was it marketable? Sun
Microsystems bet on it. In 1984, a small team of Sun engineers set out
to develop a 32-bit RISC processor called SPARC (for Scalable Processor
Architecture). The idea was to use the chips in a new line of
workstations. One day, Scott McNealy, then
Sun’s CEO, showed up at the SPARC development lab. “He said that SPARC
would take Sun from a $500-million-a-year company to a
billion-dollar-a-year company,” recalls Patterson, a consultant to the
SPARC project.
If
that weren’t pressure enough, many outside Sun had expressed doubt the
company could pull it off. Worse still, Sun’s marketing team had had a
terrifying realization: SPARC spelled backward was…CRAPS! Team members
had to swear they would not utter that word to anyone even inside
Sun—lest the word get out to archrival MIPS Technologies, which was also exploring the RISC concept.
The
first version of the minimalist SPARC consisted of a “20 000-gate-array
processor without even integer multiply/divide instructions,” says
Robert Garner, the lead SPARC architect and now an IBM researcher. Yet,
at 10 million instructions per second, it ran about three times as fast
as the complex-instruction-set computer (CISC) processors of the day.
Sun
would use SPARC to power profitable workstations and servers for years
to come. The first SPARC-based product, introduced in 1987, was the
Sun-4 line of workstations, which quickly dominated the market and
helped propel the company’s revenues past the billion-dollar mark—just
as McNealy had prophesied.
Read more here.
by Zahir Ebrahim Written April 17, 2008 - Updated April 22, 2008. The abominable shared fates that unite Iran (“Bush and Iran,...
by Zahir Ebrahim Written April 26, 2008 - Revised May 2, 2008. Douglas J. Feith, Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, in his Hearing...
by Zahir Ebrahim March 31, 2007: I wrote this essay as the Preface to "Prisoners of the Cave" during 2003. That was four years ago....
by Zahir Ebrahim It appears that a majority of conscionable peoples opposed to their nation's war mongering for “imperial mobilization” in...
by Zahir Ebrahim Sunday April 06, 2008. It is à propos to begin this brief observation in 2008, on a cloudy Sunday morning while...
Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites






Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Slashdot
Furl
Yahoo
Blogmarks
Technorati
Newsvine
Googlize this
Facebook
Wikio





